Direct vs regular NFO refers to the two ways an investor can subscribe to a New Fund Offer. The structure you choose affects cost, long-term returns, and the level of advisory support you receive. While both options invest in the same underlying portfolio, the difference lies in how the investment is routed and the expenses are charged. Understanding the direct vs regular NFO structure helps you make a more informed decision, especially when aligning it with your broader financial strategy.
What is direct NFO?
A Direct NFO (Direct New Fund Offer) is a newly launched scheme purchased directly from the fund house without involving any distributor or intermediary. In simple terms, you invest straight with the asset management company.
Under this structure, no distributor commission is paid, which means the expense ratio is lower compared to the regular plan. Over time, this cost difference can have a measurable impact on returns.
Many investors exploring NFO (New Fund Offers) prefer the direct route when they are confident about evaluating schemes on their own. In practice, this option suits individuals who understand risk, strategy, and portfolio allocation without requiring advisory assistance.
What is a regular NFO?
A regular NFO is a newly launched scheme bought through a financial advisor, broker, or distributor. The portfolio is the same as the direct plan. However, the expense ratio is higher because it includes distributor commission. Many investors choose the regular option for guidance. An advisor can assess suitability, explain risks, and align the scheme with a long-term investment plan. For first-time investors, this support makes the process clearer and more structured.
Difference between direct vs regular NFO
The difference between direct and regular NFO lies primarily in cost structure and distribution model, not in portfolio composition. To understand the direct vs regular NFO difference clearly, let’s compare them across practical parameters.
Parameter |
Direct NFO |
Regular NFO |
Mode of purchase |
Directly through the fund house |
Through broker or distributor |
Expense ratio |
Lower, as no commission is paid |
Higher, includes distributor commission |
Returns (long term) |
Slightly higher due to lower costs |
Slightly lower due to higher expense ratio |
Advisory support |
No intermediary support |
Includes advisory guidance |
Suitability |
Experienced, self-directed investors |
Investors seeking assistance |
Portfolio composition |
Same as regular NFO |
Same as direct NFO |
In practice, the difference between direct and regular NFO becomes visible over longer holding periods. Even a small variation in expense ratio can affect compounded returns. However, the regular vs direct NFO decision should depend on whether you require professional guidance or prefer managing investments independently.
How do you recognise if a NFO is regular or direct?
Here’s how you can identify the structure:
Check the scheme name
The word “Direct” is clearly mentioned in the scheme title if it is a direct plan.Look at the expense ratio
Direct plans show a lower expense ratio in the scheme document.Review the transaction mode
If purchased via a distributor or advisor, it is usually a regular plan.Refer to the account statement
Your Consolidated Account Statement specifies whether the investment is direct or regular.
Basically, the distinction is transparent if you review the documentation carefully.
Which is better, direct or regular NFO?
There is no universally right option in the direct vs regular NFO comparison. The right choice depends on your comfort level and financial awareness.
Choose direct NFO if:
You understand risk, compare schemes independently, and want to minimise costs.Choose regular NFO if:
You prefer professional guidance, structured advice, and portfolio monitoring support.
Many times, investors underestimate the value of advice. At the same time, experienced investors may prioritise cost efficiency. The decision should align with your long-term investment plan rather than short-term savings alone.
Conclusion
The direct vs regular NFO decision is less about performance potential and more about cost structure and advisory preference. Both invest in the same securities and follow the same mandate. The real difference lies in how the investment is accessed and the expenses incurred. Over time, lower costs in direct plans can enhance returns, while regular plans offer the comfort of professional guidance. Ultimately, the better choice depends on your experience, confidence, and long-term financial objectives.
FAQs On Direct Vs Regular NFO
-
How will I know if I have invested in a direct or regular NFO?
Check the scheme name in your account statement. If it includes the word “Direct,” it is a direct plan. Otherwise, it is a regular plan.
-
Can I start with a regular NFO and later switch to a direct NFO?
Yes, you can switch from a regular to a direct plan for the same scheme. However, it is treated as a redemption and fresh investment, and tax* implications may apply.
-
Can I hold both direct and regular NFO in the same portfolio?
Yes, it is possible to hold both versions of the same scheme. They are treated as separate investments for tracking and reporting purposes.
-
How do I invest in a direct NFO?
You can invest directly through the fund house website or authorised online investment platforms that offer direct plans.
-
Are regular NFO more secure than direct NFO?
No. Both direct and regular NFO invest in the same portfolio and carry the same market risk. The only difference is the cost structure and distribution channel.
FOR EXISTING POLICY
FOR NEW POLICY